Comparative Analysis

Hundred Years' War: Edwardian Phase vs Hundred Years' War

Compare not just who won, but how it was won through the data: force balance, casualties, inventory, operational capacity, and military perspective...

Hundred Years' War: Edwardian Phase

1337 - 1360

Hundred Years' War

24 Mayıs 1337 - 19 October 1453

Summary

Hundred Years' War: Edwardian Phase

1337 - 1360

Battle Scale
General Operation
Winner
Kingdom of England and Allies
Parties

Kingdom of England and Allies

EnglandEnglish

Kingdom of France

FranceFrench

Hundred Years' War

24 Mayıs 1337 - 19 October 1453

Battle Scale
General Operation
Winner
Kingdom of France and Allies
Parties

Kingdom of England and Allies

EnglandEnglish

Kingdom of France and Allies

FranceFrench

Operational Capacity Matrix

Hundred Years' War: Edwardian Phase

Sustainability Logistics7245
Command & Control C28142
Time & Space Usage8836
Intelligence & Recon7628
Force Multipliers Morale/Tech8553

Hundred Years' War

Sustainability Logistics4278
Command & Control C26841
Time & Space Usage5567
Intelligence & Recon4952
Force Multipliers Morale/Tech7338

Force Projection

Hundred Years' War: Edwardian Phase

Kingdom of England and Allies%62 -> %68+6%
%68
%18
Kingdom of France%38 -> %18-20%

Hundred Years' War

Kingdom of England and Allies%48 -> %23-25%
%23
%71
Kingdom of France and Allies%52 -> %71+19%

Strategic Victory

Hundred Years' War: Edwardian Phase

Kingdom of England and Allies

Kingdom of England and Allies
%78
%22
Kingdom of France

Hundred Years' War

Kingdom of France and Allies

Kingdom of England and Allies
%17
%83
Kingdom of France and Allies

Casualties & Attrition

Casualties & AttritionHundred Years' War: Edwardian PhaseKingdom of England and AlliesHundred Years' War: Edwardian PhaseKingdom of FranceHundred Years' WarKingdom of England and AlliesHundred Years' WarKingdom of France and Allies
Personnel
15,000+ PersonnelEstimated
40,000+ PersonnelEstimated
75,000+ Military PersonnelEstimated
Other
Limited horses and equipmentConfirmed
2x Cog WarshipsIntelligence Report
Minimal supply depotsUnverified
Thousands of horses and equipmentConfirmed
5x Galleys and 10x Merchant ShipsIntelligence Report
50+ Castles and Fortified PositionsConfirmed
Political prestige and economic ruinConfirmed
Thousands of Mounted KnightsConfirmed
200+ Castles and Fortified PositionsEstimated
All French Territories except CalaisConfirmed
Overseas Logistics BasesEstimated
200,000+ Military and Civilian LossesEstimated
15,000+ Mounted KnightsEstimated
500+ Villages and Towns DevastatedEstimated
Legitimacy Crisis of the French ThroneConfirmed
Capture of King John IIConfirmed

Tactical Inventory / Weapons

Hundred Years' War: Edwardian PhaseHundred Years' War
Armor / Vehicles

Kingdom of England and Allies

  • Chainmail and Plate Armor

Kingdom of France

  • Chainmail and Plate Armor

Kingdom of England and Allies

  • Armored Cavalry (Knight)

Kingdom of France and Allies

Artillery / Siege

Kingdom of England and Allies

Kingdom of France

Kingdom of England and Allies

Kingdom of France and Allies

  • Artillery Batteries
Other

Kingdom of England and Allies

  • English Longbow
  • Mounted Archer Tactics
  • Chevauchée Raiding Strategy
  • Cog Warship

Kingdom of France

  • Heavy Feudal Cavalry
  • Arbalest
  • Siege Engines
  • Galley Warship

Kingdom of England and Allies

  • Longbow
  • Landing Ships
  • Siege Engines
  • Early Firearms

Kingdom of France and Allies

  • Heavy Cavalry (Knight)
  • Crossbow
  • Castle Fortifications
  • River Fleet

Staff Analysis

Hundred Years' War: Edwardian Phase
Hundred Years' War

Against the rigid French doctrine of feudal cavalry charges, England employed flexible tactics coordinating mounted archers and infantry. France could not adapt to this asymmetric flexibility.

France showed asymmetric flexibility by transitioning from feudal tactics to a professional army doctrine during the war. England remained overly dependent on longbow tactics and failed to adapt to changing conditions.

War of Attrition — England's chevauchée tactics aimed to systematically collapse the French economy and morale; major pitched battles complemented this strategy.

War of Annihilation — England initially sought quick victory by annihilating the enemy army in pitched battles. As the war dragged on, it became a War of Attrition, with France leveraging resource superiority to wear down the English and achieve final victory.

England correctly identified its center of gravity, directing main forces toward France's economic and political heartland—Île-de-France and Normandy—and succeeded in destroying the feudal army as the center of French resistance.

England defined its Schwerpunkt as destroying the French army in pitched battle. France shifted its center of resistance to castle and city defenses, neutralizing the English striking power.

The English frequently used night raids and ambush tactics to surprise the French. At Auberoche, the French suffered heavy defeat due to intelligence failures and deception.

England skillfully used terrain at Agincourt to force the French into a compressed attack despite numerical inferiority. France employed deception and strategic withdrawal tactics throughout the war.

Intensive volleys from English longbows broke French cavalry charges, creating shock effect. Although artillery was limited, combined archer-infantry tactics ensured firepower dominance.

The arrow storm of the English longbow shocked the French cavalry, particularly at Crécy and Agincourt, causing psychological collapse. Development of French artillery proved decisive in sieges during the final phases.

At Crécy and Poitiers, the English selected defensible slopes and used weather conditions like rain and mud to slow the French cavalry.

France's vast plains and river networks hindered English troop movements. Rain and mud disadvantaged French heavy cavalry at Agincourt. England, with naval dominance and the Channel, had a logistical edge, but on land suffered from geographical depth disadvantage.

England, through capable intelligence officers like Seneschal Oliver Ingham, exploited local dynamics to its advantage. By winning over lords such as Albret, it disrupted French plans.

England initially gained advantage by effectively analyzing the enemy's feudal divisions. France failed to exploit English internal politics (Wars of the Roses). Overall, both sides knew each other well, but strategic surprises were limited.

The English army, sustaining itself through plunder and utilizing interior lines with mounted troops, could maneuver faster than French forces.

England employed chevauchée raids for rapid and destructive strikes against the French economy and morale. France used interior lines advantage for defense, constricting English maneuver space.

The victory at Crécy gave English soldiers unshakeable morale superiority; the French suffered psychological collapse after their noble cavalry's defeat. The capture of King John II at Poitiers reinforced this.

The emergence of Joan of Arc sparked religious and national fervor on the French side, providing moral superiority. In England, war fatigue and internal strife eroded military motivation.

England diplomatically encircled France through political alliances in Flanders and Brittany, creating economic pressure. However, direct military victory was necessary for final success.

France, especially under Charles V, avoided pitched battles and pursued a strategy of attrition and castle sieges to wear down the English. England attempted to encircle France through diplomacy, forming alliances with regions like Flanders and Brittany.

Popular battle comparisons