Comparative Analysis

Lithuanian Civil War (1432–1438) vs Polish–Teutonic War (1431–1435)

Compare not just who won, but how it was won through the data: force balance, casualties, inventory, operational capacity, and military perspective...

Lithuanian Civil War (1432–1438)

1432 - 1438

Polish–Teutonic War (1431–1435)

1431 - 31 Aralık 1435

Summary

Lithuanian Civil War (1432–1438)

1432 - 1438

Battle Scale
General Operation
Winner
Forces of Sigismund Kęstutaitis and Polish Allies
Parties

Forces of Švitrigaila and Allies

Grand Duchy of Lithuania (Švitrigaila faction)Lithuanian

Forces of Sigismund Kęstutaitis and Polish Allies

Grand Duchy of Lithuania (Sigismund faction) and Kingdom of PolandPolish

Polish–Teutonic War (1431–1435)

1431 - 31 Aralık 1435

Battle Scale
General Operation
Winner
Kingdom of Poland and Allies (Hussites, Lithuania, Moldavia)
Parties

Kingdom of Poland and Allies (Hussites, Lithuania, Moldavia)

PolandPolish

Teutonic Order and Allies (Švitrigaila, Livonian Order)

Teutonic OrderGermanic

Operational Capacity Matrix

Lithuanian Civil War (1432–1438)

Sustainability Logistics4267
Command & Control C23173
Time & Space Usage5661
Intelligence & Recon3872
Force Multipliers Morale/Tech4763

Polish–Teutonic War (1431–1435)

Sustainability Logistics7153
Command & Control C26756
Time & Space Usage7347
Intelligence & Recon6451
Force Multipliers Morale/Tech7849

Force Projection

Lithuanian Civil War (1432–1438)

Forces of Švitrigaila and Allies%37 -> %7-30%
%7
%58
Forces of Sigismund Kęstutaitis and Polish Allies%63 -> %58-5%

Polish–Teutonic War (1431–1435)

Kingdom of Poland and Allies (Hussites, Lithuania, Moldavia)%58 -> %54-4%
%54
%13
Teutonic Order and Allies (Švitrigaila, Livonian Order)%42 -> %13-29%

Strategic Victory

Lithuanian Civil War (1432–1438)

Forces of Sigismund Kęstutaitis and Polish Allies

Forces of Švitrigaila and Allies
%9
%86
Forces of Sigismund Kęstutaitis and Polish Allies

Polish–Teutonic War (1431–1435)

Kingdom of Poland and Allies (Hussites, Lithuania, Moldavia)

Kingdom of Poland and Allies (Hussites, Lithuania, Moldavia)
%71
%23
Teutonic Order and Allies (Švitrigaila, Livonian Order)

Casualties & Attrition

Casualties & AttritionLithuanian Civil War (1432–1438)Forces of Švitrigaila and AlliesLithuanian Civil War (1432–1438)Forces of Sigismund Kęstutaitis and Polish AlliesPolish–Teutonic War (1431–1435)Kingdom of Poland and Allies (Hussites, Lithuania, Moldavia)Polish–Teutonic War (1431–1435)Teutonic Order and Allies (Švitrigaila, Livonian Order)
Personnel
5,000+ PersonnelEstimated
1,200+ Mounted TroopsConfirmed
2,500+ PersonnelEstimated
800+ Mounted TroopsEstimated
4500+ PersonnelEstimated
8200+ PersonnelEstimated
Tanks
800x Heavy ArmorIntelligence Report
Other
3x Staff Command MembersUnverified
400x Light WeaponsIntelligence Report
1x Staff Command MemberUnverified
850+ Cavalry HorsesEstimated
12x War WagonsIntelligence Report
3x Supply ConvoysUnverified
2100+ Cavalry HorsesEstimated
27x Castles and TownsConfirmed
9x Supply DepotsIntelligence Report

Tactical Inventory / Weapons

Lithuanian Civil War (1432–1438)Polish–Teutonic War (1431–1435)
Armor / Vehicles

Forces of Švitrigaila and Allies

  • Teutonic Knights Armored Cavalry

Forces of Sigismund Kęstutaitis and Polish Allies

  • Polish Armored Cavalry Unit

Kingdom of Poland and Allies (Hussites, Lithuania, Moldavia)

Teutonic Order and Allies (Švitrigaila, Livonian Order)

Artillery / Siege

Forces of Švitrigaila and Allies

Forces of Sigismund Kęstutaitis and Polish Allies

Kingdom of Poland and Allies (Hussites, Lithuania, Moldavia)

  • Early Hand Cannon (Píšťala)

Teutonic Order and Allies (Švitrigaila, Livonian Order)

  • Wooden Bombard Siege Gun
Other

Forces of Švitrigaila and Allies

  • Light Cavalry Contingent
  • Tatar Mounted Archers
  • City Militias

Forces of Sigismund Kęstutaitis and Polish Allies

  • Infantry Reinforcements
  • Catholic Crusader Detachments
  • City Garrisons

Kingdom of Poland and Allies (Hussites, Lithuania, Moldavia)

  • Hussite War Wagon (Wagenburg)
  • Polish Heavy Cavalry
  • Lithuanian Light Cavalry
  • Moldavian Mounted Archers

Teutonic Order and Allies (Švitrigaila, Livonian Order)

  • Teutonic Heavy Knight Cavalry
  • Tatar Allied Light Cavalry
  • Germanic Pike Infantry
  • Konitz and Schwetz Fortifications

Staff Analysis

Lithuanian Civil War (1432–1438)
Polish–Teutonic War (1431–1435)

Side 2 adapted Polish military doctrine to Lithuanian conditions with a flexible defense-offense balance, while Side 1 remained stuck in traditional Eastern European tactics and failed to adapt to changing war conditions.

Poland blended traditional feudal cavalry with Hussite Wagenburg infantry and Tatar/Moldavian light horse in an asymmetric doctrine; the Teutonic Order remained locked in 13th-century crusading doctrine.

Attrition War — Both sides pursued prolonged attrition strategies reliant on external allies, with regional skirmishes rather than decisive pitched battles extending the conflict.

Attrition War — Through cycles of raids and counter-raids, the Teutonic economic and manpower base was systematically eroded, prioritizing the breaking of will over annihilation.

Side 2 correctly focused its center of gravity on the political-economic heartland around Vilnius, while Side 1 prioritized alliances with Russian principalities and neglected the homeland.

Poland correctly identified the Order's Schwerpunkt as its Švitrigaila linkage and collapsed it both through the Pomeranian raid and the decisive Battle of Wiłkomierz; the Teutonic Order dispersed its center of gravity into Dobrzyń raids as a fatal error.

Side 2 dissolved Švitrigaila's alliance through disinformation and bribery targeting his allies; Side 1 was deceived by misleading intelligence about the enemy army's true strength.

Granting safe passage through Polish territory to Czech Hussite forces was a deception the Teutonic Order did not foresee; the Order had not contemplated that Poland would ally with heretics.

Side 2's heavily armored Polish cavalry provided decisive shock power against Side 1's lightly armed infantry and cavalry, especially breaking enemy lines at Wilkomierz.

Hussite war wagons and early artillery provided mechanical shock that halted Teutonic cavalry charges; at Wiłkomierz, the Lithuanian-Polish splitting of Korybut's army was a classical shock maneuver.

Lithuania's marshy and forested terrain restricted large army maneuvers, favoring Side 2's defensive strategy. The Neman River region served as a critical natural barrier shaping the course of battles.

The Hussite "beautiful ride" exploited Prussia's open plains and river lines (Vistula) to sever Teutonic cities from each other; the terrain favored the Polish coalition's maneuver warfare.

Side 2 utilized Poland's extensive intelligence network and correspondence with the Pope to learn of Švitrigaila's secret treaties with Moscow and the Teutons, enabling preemptive diplomacy; Side 1 failed to fully assess the scale of Polish military aid to Sigismund.

After the Treaty of Christmemel, Jogaila deciphered the Order's plan to fracture Lithuania via Švitrigaila and played the Hussite card proactively; the Teutonic side underestimated Poland's multi-front coalition capacity.

Side 2 used interior lines centered on Vilnius to rapidly deploy forces, while Side 1 remained dispersed across a wide allied geography and delayed concentrating its strength.

The Hussite four-month rapid raid along the Konitz-Schwetz-Danzig-Dirschau axis turned the interior lines advantage in favor of the Polish coalition; the Teutonic Order withdrew to its fortresses and squandered time in static defense.

Side 2's Catholic Lithuanian nobles fought with high combat morale due to faith and confidence in the Polish union, whereas cultural fragmentation among Side 1's Orthodox and pagan elements and the leader's indecisiveness lowered morale.

The collapse of the Livonian branch at Wiłkomierz revived the Grunwald trauma and shattered Teutonic will; on the Polish side, the Hussite victory and Jogaila's rehabilitation with the Church boosted morale.

Side 2 neutralized Švitrigaila's potential allies through the diplomatic maneuvers of King Władysław Jagiełło, particularly securing Papal support for religious legitimacy, thereby gaining significant pre-war strategic advantage.

Poland diplomatically isolated the Teutonic Order from the Holy Roman Empire by organizing the Hussite alliance and securing Moldavian and Pomeranian backing; this encirclement broke the Order's bargaining position before combat.

Popular battle comparisons